JSON Response Performance about lz-string HOT 6 CLOSED

My first guess is that the extra 10 seconds are spent outside the compression. Can you make a jsfiddle out of it so that I can see your code in action?

from lz-string.

I have a jsfiddle that grabs data from a source and then compresses it.

One of the URLS (static json file) compresses very quickly (< 1000ms).
The dynamic url compresses much slower (~7500ms).

Switch between the two URL variables to see the difference.

http://jsfiddle.net/theur7nd/2/

Thanks for your help.

from lz-string.

I've slightly modified your jsfiddle to add the size of the input: http://jsfiddle.net/u52ujty5/

What I see from my computer (Chromium - Linux) :

• With dynamicEndPoint: Done in: 508 for 867331 bytes
• With staticJSONFile: Done in: 507 for 785159 bytes

This looks pretty reasonable to me... Firefox exhibits the same behavior.

What is the config you're using? (OS/browser)

from lz-string.

OOI, the URL for the dynamic end point has ?time=?time= ... I assume that this has no effect.

from lz-string.

I see similar results now as well.

Thanks for your time on this. You know, our API team actually updated the dynamic response within the last few days and now instead of 30s, it's almost instant, I think when it was taking 30s to pull the response, that's when the compression was taking 10s longer, not sure why.

from lz-string.

Allright, thanks for the feedback.

from lz-string.