Fix Get-Help links (in the Pester source files) about docs HOT 9 CLOSED

Yes, think so.

from docs.

I can pick this one up.

from docs.

Cool, that would be awesome. Please keep a couple of things in mind.

• all links in the source should probably be a direct link to the corresponding pester.dev website (e.g. replacce It with the full link (or the website links will not work)
• we should probably make this a co-op. You make the changes in Pester repository, I use your Pester PR branch to generate a PR in this repository with the auto-generated command reference here.

Does that sound ok to you?

from docs.

Broke the blocks of links into separate chunks yesterday but before I go any further, I want to check about the actual link text. I get that some are using the old url and the wrong page name that can be fixed. I am more wondering about whether each command should have an online link to the docs . For example I think this is correct (with comments afterwards):

Context

...

.LINK
https://pester.dev/docs/commands/Context (change url)

.LINK
Describe (related command, leave as is ?)

.LINK
about_Should (related command, leave as is ?)

from docs.

I guess @nohwnd should check your Pester PR, see what he thinks.

from docs.

If you are for example suggesting we should leave ‘about_Should’ exactly that text then I wonder what happens inside Docusaurus. Does it produce a valid URL by itself? If not, changing it to full url should be the best solution IMO but that’s personal. I prefer to see full links when running Get-Help but... perhaps other systems/tools expect this format.

Apologies for the long text, was a bit of a long day

from docs.

No, no problem. I'll make a PR as it is with fixed links etc. but leave the rest alone for now and we can see what opinions come out.

from docs.

Aha, I think I understand now. I will generate a PR here using your Pester PR somewhere this Friday or weekend. That way we can reason about/view the outcome. Thanks again!

from docs.

pester/Pester#1432

Added a note about what the correct format is for all .LINK entries.

from docs.