function application about kalker HOT 3 CLOSED

Well, this kind of thing is currently made to only support one-param functions, to avoid even more ambiguity. the problem is that it needs to be able to figure out if you're multiplying or not. For example if you write sin2x, it should interpret it as sin(2*x), and spaces are not kept from the tokenizing. However, if given enough context, the parser may be able to figure it out, but that may lead to excessive complexity.

from kalker.

I disagree that g 1 2 should work. It is fairly common in mathematics to temporarily adopt additional notation, so one can e.g. say:

Let x∗y denote 1-(1-x)+(1-y). Now, 0.5∗0.5 = 0.75 …

When using a 2-param function without parenthesis, the first parameter should be taken from the left of the function name. This will allow writing the above human language as:

>> ∗(x,y) = 1-(1-x)(1-y)
>> 0.5∗0.5
0.75

from kalker.

This would lead to excessive complexity and is probably not worth it.

from kalker.