Static RMPaths about route-me HOT 5 CLOSED

BTW.. If it's not currently possible, please let me know how you might implement it and I can flesh that out and upload it.
Thanks!

from route-me.

It's not designed to handle layers on the map without an annotation, since there is a lot of logic attached to the annotations, like moving the annotation layers with the map (map and layers are two different views).

If you really want to try it, have a look at

- (void)correctPositionOfAllAnnotationsIncludingInvisibles:(BOOL)correctAllAnnotations wasZoom:(BOOL)wasZoom;

especially

[overlayView addSublayer:annotation.layer];

But I doubt you will be happy with static paths...

from route-me.

I'll take a look... Is there any interest in supporting "static layers"? If so, I can start working on an implementation of that, otherwise I might try and keep to the annotation route to stay compatible with the library going forward (I really like this new iteration of the route-me library, I am just having a couple of legacy conversion issues, but getting my custom tile sources up to speed was no problem and I love the more efficient memory footprint, so thanks to everyone that have already contributed!).

from route-me.

Is this related to #18? If so, it would probably be better to solve that problem first. Adding layers to the map without annotations is not really intended usage, so it might be easier to look for other solutions first... :)

from route-me.

Yes, it's related. I think the bounding box idea might be perfect. I basically need the ability to place some RMMapLayers on the map for various elements that are not specific points, rather "regions".. So, RMCircle, custom RMPaths and other items that descend from RMMapLayer. However, I think whatever comes out of #18 is going to solve this one as well.

from route-me.