Feature: MDC support about kotlin-logging HOT 11 CLOSED

ok, I will implement few flavors, let me know what you think.

from kotlin-logging.

coroutines support is now available, more details here: https://github.com/MicroUtils/kotlin-logging/wiki#mdc-and-threadscoroutines

from kotlin-logging.

looks like a neat idea! any other suggestions?

from kotlin-logging.

How about an extension method instead:

inline fun <T> Pair<String, String>.asLoggingContextOf(body: () -> T): T = 
            MDC.putCloseable(first, second).use { body() }

from kotlin-logging.

That works well if you have a single key/value pair you want to put into context.
How would multiple pairs or "additive" contexts look like?

I think that coming up with the right API here will be a bit difficult, so it might be worth it to enumerate use cases. Here are at least a few I am thinking of:

• wrapping some method body with single pair:

  fun myFunction(name: String) {
    mdc.withContext("name" to name) {
      doThing()
    }
  }

• wrapping multiple pairs

  fun myFunction(name: String) {
    mdc.withContext("name" to name, "otherThing" to "otherValue") {
      doThing()
    }
  }

• a map of parameters

  fun myFunction(params: Map<String, String>) {
    mdc.withContext(params) {
      doThing()
    }
  }

• coroutines support in (not sure how this works without more coroutine support, possibly in a different libarary or out of scope for this request)

  fun myFunction(name: String) {
    launch(CommonPool) {
      mdc.withContext("name" to name) {
        // support for suspending functions?
        val thing1 = doThing1()
        val thing2 = doThing2()
        thing + thing2
      }
    }
  }

from kotlin-logging.

I think coroutines are out of the initial scope as MDC current infra relies on threads.
Basically, for multiple pairs it is possible to do something like:

(key1 to value1).asLoggingContextOf { 
  (key2 to value2).asLoggingContextOf {
     ... 
  }
} 

So the real question here is how required / strong is the use case. Currently, I don't use MDC (although I might start using it when support will be available ;-)
But I am not sure how strong is the use case. If it was I guess it would probably be implemented in MDC.putCloseable() as well.

It is always easier to start with partial API and add later.

What do you think?

from kotlin-logging.

I agree in cutting MDC support for coroutines the first iteration of this. There might be some way to handle it with ContinuationInterceptor but that can be held off on as it isn't the main use case (for me at least) right now.

The background for how I am hoping to migrate to MDC in one part of our application:

• We have an old log4j format custom layout that converts messages to JSON
• loggers construct and pass in a special type type we have to the logger.info(Object message) (and other levels) that has a map of keys and values that are added to to the constructed JSON. This gets output and consumed downstream in log collection infrastructure
• SLF4J API takes a String message, so we can't really keep passing in our custom object

I'd like to get us moving forward for us by:

• Switch all of our stuff from using Log4j directly to SLF4J
• Switch to using this library (which we are using in other places already)
• store those key/values in MDC and have a Layout pull them out and format the message as JSON instead

In our case, our key/value maps sometimes have 9-10 keys and values, so repeating (k to v).asLoggingContextOf {} that many nested times is not desirable.

vararg Pair<> (or N-arg Pair methods similar to Guava with https://google.github.io/guava/releases/21.0/api/docs/com/google/common/collect/ImmutableList.html#of-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E- and https://google.github.io/guava/releases/21.0/api/docs/com/google/common/collect/ImmutableList.html#of-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E...-) or Map<> methods would be more useful for our case.

We can do all of that migration ourselves, but Kotlin-friendly MDC helpers are not present in this library (right now!). I can always try out a few different APIs in our own internal project and see how my teammates feel before following up here, but I thought other users may also look for it.

from kotlin-logging.

please see the commit let me know what you think, then I will push it to 1.4.9

from kotlin-logging.

👍 from me, looks good!

from kotlin-logging.

version 1.4.9 deployed.

from kotlin-logging.

More details on coroutines with mdc are here: Kotlin/kotlinx.coroutines#119

from kotlin-logging.