Clarify project status about java-spring-web HOT 3 CLOSED

Hi,

taken out of context I agree it's confusing. However if you read the description after that I think you'll have a better understanding.

The project are both equally active, they just address different needs.

If you feel that this should be made more clear, we are of course open to suggestions

from java-spring-web.

I think saying "Use opentracing-spring-cloud instead" in title gives impression that the statement has concluded only by the title; thus people may think the title is saying - just to use opentracing-spring-cloud instead of java-spring-web.

I think it is better to state the difference between those two projects and gives user's choice that you may choose opentracing-spring-cloud if that is more suitable in user's use case.

May be making title like:

• java-spring-web or opentracing-spring-cloud
• comparison to opentracing-spring-cloud
• java-spring-web vs opentracing-spring-cloud

The first statement in the section:

As it was mentioned above this library traces only inbound/outbound HTTP requests.

Please put comma between "above" and "this library", which would I think highlight more on "above" section.
"As it was mentioned above, this library ..."

from java-spring-web.

Thanks!

I'll update it soon

from java-spring-web.