Goal: be able to implement the user-provided service broker using this project about open-service-broker-sdk HOT 6 CLOSED

seems not insane. w/o looking at the user provided service broker too closely, i'd speculate that this project is already there, though, or at least really close.

from open-service-broker-sdk.

It would certainly be possible to implement it from an 80% standpoint. The gaps I would like to close are things like:

• idempotency
• automatic conflict detection
• pending operation checks (ie, reject a bind while an async update is in progress)

We are just getting to a point in the catalog incubator where we're beginning to be concerned with full compliance with the spec, and I would like for make in this project to result in a compliant broker, or at least help you build a compliant broker without having to intimately understand all the subtleties involved.

from open-service-broker-sdk.

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

from open-service-broker-sdk.

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

from open-service-broker-sdk.

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

from open-service-broker-sdk.

@openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

from open-service-broker-sdk.