Comments (6)
I recommend doing something like ontobee, e.g. rendering with strikethrough
from ontobee.
I would suggest not filtering by default but instead a) show a clearly visible visual indicator with the term(eg strike through and badge on page) and b) have any obsolete terms sorted to the end of results. Perhaps have a cookie-remembered checkbox asking for them not to be shown, not checked by default.
The principle is to ensure that the principle that terms don't just disappear I reinforced. In addition obsolete terms may have useful information such as deprecation reason or suggested alternatives.
The suggested checkbox is for people who are familiar enough that they understand what they will be missing. Remember the state by cookie is to avoid irritating users that choose this option.
from ontobee.
There are several issues related to Pier’s ENVO example:
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00002993">
<rdfs:label rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Tropical humid forests</rdfs:label>
<oboInOwl:hasOBONamespace rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">ENVO</oboInOwl:hasOBONamespace>
<oboInOwl:id rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">ENVO:00002993</oboInOwl:id>
<oboInOwl:consider rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">ENVO:01000228</oboInOwl:consider>
<owl:deprecated rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean">true</owl:deprecated>
/owl:Class
Here the classification of the term as deprecated is different from classifying it as a subclass of an “obsolete” class. It provides an Boolean value. Ontobee has not handled this issue yet.
Another issue is how to clearly show it’s an obsolete or deprecated class, such as using the strikethrough sign.
I have discussed with Edison. He will be working on it soon. Once an outcome is available, we will inform it and ask for feedback.
Oliver
From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 5:11 PM
To: ontoden/ontobee
Subject: Re: [ontobee] Obsolete ENVO classes retrieved (#43)
I would suggest not filtering by default but instead a) show a clearly visible visual indicator with the term(eg strike through and badge on page) and b) have any obsolete terms sorted to the end of results. Perhaps have a cookie-remembered checkbox asking for them not to be shown, not checked by default.
The principle is to ensure that the principle that terms don't just disappear I reinforced. In addition obsolete terms may have useful information such as deprecation reason or suggested alternatives.
The suggested checkbox is for people who are familiar enough that they understand what they will be missing. Remember the state by cookie is to avoid irritating users that choose this option.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/43#issuecomment-127762942.
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
from ontobee.
owl:deprecated is standard
On 4 Aug 2015, at 14:35, ontoden wrote:
There are several issues related to Pier’s ENVO example:
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00002993">
<rdfs:label
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Tropical humid
forests/rdfs:label<oboInOwl:hasOBONamespace
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">ENVO/oboInOwl:hasOBONamespace<oboInOwl:id
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">ENVO:00002993/oboInOwl:id<oboInOwl:consider
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">ENVO:01000228/oboInOwl:consider<owl:deprecated
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean">true/owl:deprecated/owl:Class
Here the classification of the term as deprecated is different from
classifying it as a subclass of an “obsolete” class. It provides
an Boolean value. Ontobee has not handled this issue yet.Another issue is how to clearly show it’s an obsolete or deprecated
class, such as using the strikethrough sign.I have discussed with Edison. He will be working on it soon. Once an
outcome is available, we will inform it and ask for feedback.Oliver
From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 5:11 PM
To: ontoden/ontobee
Subject: Re: [ontobee] Obsolete ENVO classes retrieved (#43)I would suggest not filtering by default but instead a) show a clearly
visible visual indicator with the term(eg strike through and badge on
page) and b) have any obsolete terms sorted to the end of results.
Perhaps have a cookie-remembered checkbox asking for them not to be
shown, not checked by default.The principle is to ensure that the principle that terms don't just
disappear I reinforced. In addition obsolete terms may have useful
information such as deprecation reason or suggested alternatives.The suggested checkbox is for people who are familiar enough that they
understand what they will be missing. Remember the state by cookie is
to avoid irritating users that choose this option.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on
GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/43#issuecomment-127762942.
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should
not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#43 (comment)
from ontobee.
Could the obsolete classes also be pushed to the bottom of the list when
doing a general search?
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Chris Mungall [email protected]
wrote:
owl:deprecated is standard
On 4 Aug 2015, at 14:35, ontoden wrote:
There are several issues related to Pier’s ENVO example:
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00002993">
<rdfs:label
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Tropical humid
forests/rdfs:label<oboInOwl:hasOBONamespace
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string
">ENVO/oboInOwl:hasOBONamespace<oboInOwl:id
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string
">ENVO:00002993/oboInOwl:id<oboInOwl:consider
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string
">ENVO:01000228/oboInOwl:consider<owl:deprecated
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean
">true/owl:deprecated/owl:Class
Here the classification of the term as deprecated is different from
classifying it as a subclass of an “obsolete” class. It provides
an Boolean value. Ontobee has not handled this issue yet.Another issue is how to clearly show it’s an obsolete or deprecated
class, such as using the strikethrough sign.I have discussed with Edison. He will be working on it soon. Once an
outcome is available, we will inform it and ask for feedback.Oliver
From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 5:11 PM
To: ontoden/ontobee
Subject: Re: [ontobee] Obsolete ENVO classes retrieved (#43)I would suggest not filtering by default but instead a) show a clearly
visible visual indicator with the term(eg strike through and badge on
page) and b) have any obsolete terms sorted to the end of results.
Perhaps have a cookie-remembered checkbox asking for them not to be
shown, not checked by default.The principle is to ensure that the principle that terms don't just
disappear I reinforced. In addition obsolete terms may have useful
information such as deprecation reason or suggested alternatives.The suggested checkbox is for people who are familiar enough that they
understand what they will be missing. Remember the state by cookie is
to avoid irritating users that choose this option.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on
GitHub<
https://github.com/ontoden/ontobee/issues/43#issuecomment-127762942>.
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should
not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#43 (comment)—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#43 (comment).
from ontobee.
OK. Edison just finished another update. The new update works as shown below:
For example, if we search for “forest” in the Ontobee general search (shown on the cover page), we get:
http://www.ontobee.org/browser/search.php?ontology=ENVO&keywords=forest&Submit2=Search+terms
The deprecated (or obsolete) terms are listed at the bottom of the page like this:
[cid:[email protected]]
If we click on the “Show Deprecated Terms”, we can see:
[cid:[email protected]]
Here all the deprecated terms are crossed with a strikethrough line.
We can click on one deprecated term IRI:
http://www.ontobee.org/browser/rdf.php?o=ENVO&iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00000875
It also shows the term is deprecated in the annotation section:
[cid:[email protected]]
Please check them out and let us know if you have more comments and suggestions.
Thanks!
Edison and Oliver
From: Melanie Courtot [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 5:41 AM
To: ontoden/ontobee
Cc: ontoden
Subject: Re: [ontobee] Obsolete ENVO classes retrieved (#43)
Could the obsolete classes also be pushed to the bottom of the list when
doing a general search?
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Chris Mungall <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:
owl:deprecated is standard
On 4 Aug 2015, at 14:35, ontoden wrote:
There are several issues related to Pier’s ENVO example:
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00002993">
<rdfs:label
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Tropical humid
forests/rdfs:label<oboInOwl:hasOBONamespace
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string�>> ">ENVO/oboInOwl:hasOBONamespace<oboInOwl:id
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string�>> ">ENVO:00002993/oboInOwl:id<oboInOwl:consider
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string�>> ">ENVO:01000228/oboInOwl:consider<owl:deprecated
rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean
<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean�>> ">true/owl:deprecated/owl:Class
Here the classification of the term as deprecated is different from
classifying it as a subclass of an “obsolete” class. It provides
an Boolean value. Ontobee has not handled this issue yet.Another issue is how to clearly show it’s an obsolete or deprecated
class, such as using the strikethrough sign.I have discussed with Edison. He will be working on it soon. Once an
outcome is available, we will inform it and ask for feedback.Oliver
From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 5:11 PM
To: ontoden/ontobee
Subject: Re: [ontobee] Obsolete ENVO classes retrieved (#43)I would suggest not filtering by default but instead a) show a clearly
visible visual indicator with the term(eg strike through and badge on
page) and b) have any obsolete terms sorted to the end of results.
Perhaps have a cookie-remembered checkbox asking for them not to be
shown, not checked by default.The principle is to ensure that the principle that terms don't just
disappear I reinforced. In addition obsolete terms may have useful
information such as deprecation reason or suggested alternatives.The suggested checkbox is for people who are familiar enough that they
understand what they will be missing. Remember the state by cookie is
to avoid irritating users that choose this option.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on
GitHub<
https://github.com/ontoden/ontobee/issues/43#issuecomment-127762942>.
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should
not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#43 (comment)—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#43 (comment).
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/43#issuecomment-127935763.
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
from ontobee.
Related Issues (20)
- SEP Sample Processing and Separation Techniques Ontology not available in Ontobee HOT 1
- Ontofox Bug: Some ontologies not updating/importing HOT 7
- Expired certificates on ontobee.org ? HOT 2
- ontobee is currently down HOT 3
- Problem in visualization and browsing of ONS in ONTOBEE HOT 3
- Reload GENEPIO HOT 3
- Is DOID included in OntoBee? HOT 4
- The main page has "Drosophila Phenotype Ontology" listed as the title for FBcv HOT 1
- MS ontology not working in Ontobee HOT 3
- OCRe is not loading HOT 1
- The main http://www.ontobee.org is down? HOT 2
- 503 status code when trying to connect to https://sparql.hegroup.org/sparql
- Server is down again? HOT 2
- Schema changed, breaking our code HOT 12
- Reduce number of redirects from purl?
- [BUG] PECO links are broken
- [BUG] PO links are broken HOT 2
- [BUG] TO links are broken HOT 4
- server is "unreliable" - disappears for hours once or twice a week HOT 1
- ontobee is still down HOT 3
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from ontobee.