Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (8)

mlipizer avatar mlipizer commented on June 20, 2024 1

@mlipizer so are you saying that http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P35/current/EPC00153/ should only be dissolved organic phosphorus?
The issue is that dissolved or total (filtered and unfiltered phase) cannot be aggregated with particulate (> some filtered phase). The particulate phase is (usually) much lower than dissolved. This means that aggregating filtered (< some filter) and unfiltered phase is acceptable, while particulate phase should be kept separated.

Also, we already have: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P35/current/EPC00201/ for particulate phosphorus. Will that not be confusing if we now also create a code for particulate organic phosphorus? what is the use case for the separation of phosphorus into these three P35 aggregations?
Your comment is correct. Besides, the P02 is "Particulate total and organic phosphorus concentrations in the water column" which combines total (EPC00201) and organic. SO: no need to create a new a code for particulate organic phosphorus.
Sorry for this.

from emodnetchemvocabs.

mlipizer avatar mlipizer commented on June 20, 2024 1

CHLTVOLU

I see your point. We will evaluate these issues. PLEASE DO NOT PROCEED (thank you)

from emodnetchemvocabs.

mlipizer avatar mlipizer commented on June 20, 2024 1

Dear Gwen, we had an internal meeting with regional leaders and it was proposed to leave this P01 outside P35 for the moment. So: no action on this issue. Thank yoy

from emodnetchemvocabs.

gwemon avatar gwemon commented on June 20, 2024

@mlipizer so are you saying that http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P35/current/EPC00153/ should only be dissolved organic phosphorus?
Also, we already have: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P35/current/EPC00201/ for particulate phosphorus. Will that not be confusing if we now also create a code for particulate organic phosphorus? what is the use case for the separation of phosphorus into these three P35 aggregations?

from emodnetchemvocabs.

gwemon avatar gwemon commented on June 20, 2024

@mlipizer CHLTVOLU is a very generic code for "chlorophyll" - any chlorophylls, coming from any kind of measurements, possibly even from uncalibrated fluorometer outputs. Are you asking for its inclusion because you know that it is being used instead of more specific codes? Do we know how often this code is used in the SeaDataNet network and with what kind of L22 instrumentation?

from emodnetchemvocabs.

gwemon avatar gwemon commented on June 20, 2024

@mlipizer please let me know about the 2 open questions:
CHLTVOLU to EPC00105 --> see my comment above (this is not "chlorophyll-a" but "chlorophyll") --> still okay to proceed?
NTRZKGD1 to EPC00005 --> done
DOXYSC02 to EPC00002 --> if we do this then whenever a DOXYSC02 value is present (probably mainly from datasets coming from BODC CTD processed casts) then it will duplicate a DOXYSC01 value so an average or a selection will need to be made if duplicate data points are not accepted; is it still okay to proceed?
NTCOKGD1 and NTOTCOD1 to EPC00160 --> done
NTOTKJM1 to EPC00134 --> done
TPHSWCD3 to EPC00186 --> done

from emodnetchemvocabs.

mlipizer avatar mlipizer commented on June 20, 2024

DOXYSC02 to EPC00002 --> if we do this then whenever a DOXYSC02 value is present (probably mainly from datasets coming from BODC CTD processed casts) then it will duplicate a DOXYSC01 value so an average or a selection will need to be made if duplicate data points are not accepted; is it still okay to proceed?

I do not understand clearly this. IS this code used for duplicated data acquired at the same time/place of "first sensors"?

from emodnetchemvocabs.

gwemon avatar gwemon commented on June 20, 2024

DOXYSC02 to EPC00002 --> if we do this then whenever a DOXYSC02 value is present (probably mainly from datasets coming from BODC CTD processed casts) then it will duplicate a DOXYSC01 value so an average or a selection will need to be made if duplicate data points are not accepted; is it still okay to proceed?

I do not understand clearly this. IS this code used for duplicated data acquired at the same time/place of "first sensors"?

@mlipizer it's for duplicated sensor on the same platform. i.e. a "secondary" sensor that is effectively a duplicate sensor in case of the the sensors fail. Was just flagging this in case it complicates your checks for duplicates. hey should be reading the same value unless there is an issue with one of the sensor.

from emodnetchemvocabs.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.