compatible profiler api about nan HOT 3 CLOSED

Oh my, the profiler... I have barely looked at it, as very few normal modules need it. I guess it would probably require a bunch of Nan*-functions, but I am not sure if all of them should be in NAN, since they are rarely(?) used. Maybe, maybe not... It mostly depends on whether anything but https://github.com/node-inspector/v8-profiler would actually use them.

NAN is supposed to work well for "normal" use, but does not cover everything. This allows keeping the API (and documentation and maintenance) simple.

from nan.

I don't think this is something we want to do. The heap and CPU profilers are a niche. What's more, the common functionality between 3.14 and 3.25 is minimal; both the API and the data it returns have changed a great deal.

from nan.

Thanks, @kkoopa and @bnoordhuis, anyway, I almost agreed with your after your comments. :)

from nan.