[REVIEW]: GSAreport: Easy to Use Global Sensitivity Reporting about gsareport HOT 4 CLOSED

Thank you for the comments!
I will check and update the numpy conflict, we can just take the shap version and remove it in the requirements.
Good point about the readme, will clean it up a bit and will add some example images.

I used the citation syntax that the packages themselves provided, the paper uses a bibtex file, so I guess the style there is standardized no? Will check and update.

Plot functions are not that useful to automatically test I think, running the demo and checking the output basically shows that they are all working. In the tests I could check if the files exist but I don't think that it adds much. The rest of the functions is covered.

from gsareport.

Indeed, well spotted. Moved the References section to the end and called that section Related software.

from gsareport.

I have updated the readme and made it more clear for developers, pointing to the documentation to avoid duplication.

I have fixed the paper bibtex and citation style and resolved the numpy version conflict.

Hope you like it :)

from gsareport.

Thanks for considering my suggestions. I think there is an issue with the Reference title location in the paper. Shouldn't be at line 54? Otherwise all looks good now :)

from gsareport.