Getting parameters for SMPL body model about amass HOT 4 CLOSED

just a quick note: as described within the AMASS text, wherever we mention SMPL in the paper, we actually mean SMPL+H.
The figure 3 is a simplified version of the SMPL+H model and the overlayed skeleton only tries to pass the message that SMPL(+H) in contrast to SCAPE actually has an skeleton! sorry if you find that confusing.
Another quick note, is that SMPL and SMPL+H have equal shape spaces. This is important because then the location of the joints that is shape dependent, will also be equal between these models. This
further means if you configure a specific joint in SMPL and pass the same configuration to SMPL+H you get the exact same posed bodies.

Now we get to the differences of SMPL and SMPL+H.

You have guessed it right. If you want to use the SMPL+H pose vector to pose a SMPL body you have to only use elements up-to 66 (axis angle representation of 22 joints) and for the remaining 6 elements (for two joints) pass zero. These two remaining joints are hand end effectors.

The above explanation would be totally transparent when using BodyModel from human_body_prior to instantiate a body model. That is, using that code you only pass values for certain body parts, meaning root_orient, pose_body, and pose_hand. Now pose_hand for SMPL+H has to be 90 dimensions (for 2 hands x 15 joints each x 3 axis-angle parameters), and it should be 6 for SMPL model (2 hand end effectors x 3 axis angle params). If you instantiate a SMPL+H body and only pass root_orient and pose_body, then the code automatically uses zero for remaining joints.

I hope you find these explanations a bit helpful.
Nima

from amass.

I believe SMPL/SMPL-H shape space do not correspond with that of SMPL-X. See explanation here in the SMPL-X section.

from amass.

Thanks for the detailed and quick reply!

from amass.

And the first 10 betas from 16 for SMPL-X would be the shape parameters for SMPL?

from amass.