Structural Separation about avoiding-internet-centralization HOT 2 CLOSED

yes...

from avoiding-internet-centralization.

Might also be able to incorporate (or at least allude to) the competition law concept of tying:

Tying is the most common form of misuse - where the seller conditions the sale of desirable goods, the tying product (e.g., IP), on the sale of less desirable, or tied products, (e.g., other IP, goods, hardware, perhaps services). Tying is objectionable where there is appreciable economic power in the tying product’s market and this affects a substantial volume of commerce in tied product market. The four elements of tying are: (i) two separate products or services, (ii) purchase of the tying product or service made conditional on purchase of the tied product, (iii) seller has market power in the tying product and (iv) “not an insubstantial” volume of the market for the tied product is foreclosed.

-- John W. Bagby, 'An Overview of the Public Policy Impact on Standards Development'

from avoiding-internet-centralization.