Attribution for spawned project about maobjcruntime HOT 6 CLOSED

Fine by me! Attribution in the readme would be great, if the amount of code you've used warrants it, but anything which fulfills the terms of the license is ultimately fine by me (or else I wouldn't use that license!). No other comments, except that it's great to see someone building something based on the stuff I've made.

from maobjcruntime.

Thanks! If you want to take a look at it, you can find it at
https://github.com/jagill/JAGPropertyConverter

from maobjcruntime.

Neat idea. Reminds me a little of Google Protobuf, but operating at a somewhat higher level.

This statement in the readme confuses me a bit: "Since JAGPropertyConverter uses Key-Value coding to get/set values, it doesn't respect custom getters and setters" I thought KVC dealt fine with those. Have I misunderstood?

Anyway, cool stuff, and just the sort of thing I hoped to enable with my code.

from maobjcruntime.

My understanding of KVC (largely based on this doc ) is that when getting/setting a property named foo, they look for methods getFoo, foo, isFoo and setFoo:, respectively. I haven't delved into this too deeply, so if you know of a way that KVC can handle
@property (assign, getter = checkIsActive, setter = makeActive:) BOOL active;
I'd love to know about it!

from maobjcruntime.

Oh, I believe you meant custom-implemented setFoo: and foo methods. Yes, KVC should handle that -- I'll update the documentation. Thanks!

from maobjcruntime.

Yep, that was my point of confusion. I don't know whether KVC can handle custom accessor names, wouldn't surprise me if it couldn't. That could lead to some "interesting" behavior if your backing ivar does match the pattern that KVC looks for.

from maobjcruntime.