Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (6)

jimmyca15 avatar jimmyca15 commented on July 27, 2024 1

The initial design is that exceptions are not thrown if feature filters are specified for a feature and not registered in the application. We have multiple users already using this default functionality. I believe the best approach would be to keep the default behavior and to instead expose the option such that a developer can trigger the exceptions to throw.

from featuremanagement-dotnet.

jimmyca15 avatar jimmyca15 commented on July 27, 2024 1

@zhenlan you raise a good point. Promoting that as default doesn't lead to best production practices. We should encourage deterministic feature configuration. Going forward switching the default behavior to throw for unregistered filters sounds like a better option. I think it is best for us to take this change now.

from featuremanagement-dotnet.

codapus-co avatar codapus-co commented on July 27, 2024 1

The existing behavior is important for the users only because the change is a breaking one and for no other reason. The deterministic feature configuration (best production practice) is more important than not making a breaking change. especially at the current state where FeatureManagement is still in preview.

from featuremanagement-dotnet.

jimmyca15 avatar jimmyca15 commented on July 27, 2024

@zhenlan @MSGaryWang any preferences either way?

from featuremanagement-dotnet.

codapus-co avatar codapus-co commented on July 27, 2024

@jimmyca15 what you are proposing makes totally sense, regarding that multiple users already using the default functionality. I will wait for @zhenlan and @MSGaryWang comments before making any changes.

from featuremanagement-dotnet.

zhenlan avatar zhenlan commented on July 27, 2024

The initial design is that exceptions are not thrown if feature filters are specified for a feature and not registered in the application.

Is this to allow users to add new filters to existing feature flags in App Configuration before updating/redeploying the application? This doesn't sound like a good practice we would recommend for users to do in production.

I'm not sure I like the silent failure here. I need to understand better why the existing behavior is important for some users (aside from it's a breaking change). If that's indeed the case, I think we should still throw by default and provide an option to suppress it.

from featuremanagement-dotnet.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.