Bug in ticks() about python-ternary HOT 1 CLOSED

Can you post the code that triggers the issue? In python ticks will be False if ticks is empty [] or None, so I'm not sure that it's necessary to check if ticks is None versus not ticks. In any case I'd like to see what you passed in so that the issue can be fixed.

locations is necessary because ternary does not know if you want to use equally spaced ticks or not, which is the assumed behavior if locations is not supplied. Also, I think that it would be confusing if ticks=None and ticks=[] had different behaviors -- the reason that ticks=None renders something is because multiple has a non-zero default value. I'm not trying to get in the users head, and the following behaviors seem sufficient to me:

• Don't call tax.ticks() if you don't want any ticks
• Supply ticks=[...] to tax.ticks(ticks=[...]) if you want custom values to be equally spaced out. Of course you could just change the value of multiple for many such cases. If ticks=[] or None then fall back to equally spaced ticks based on multiple and scale. I assume that if the user calls tax.ticks() they want something to render.
• Supply both ticks and their locations to allow whatever the user could possibly want

from python-ternary.