LICENSE file? about dpca HOT 5 CLOSED

Thanks for the note - you are right, we should put a license file. I am definitely in favour of a permissive license like MIT, though I can also see a certain appeal for a copy-left license (like GNU GPLv3).

@dkobak : What do you think?

from dpca.

@ahwillia : I noticed that your fork of dPCA adds a couple of improvements (setup.py & documentation). Would you be willing to open a pull request to push these changes to our repository? Also, should you implement dPCA in Julia, we could add a new subfolder for this language.

from dpca.

Thanks! I'm travelling for the next few days but I can organize a PR in the
next week or so if you want.

On Sep 22, 2016 12:16 AM, "Wieland Brendel" [email protected]
wrote:

@ahwillia https://github.com/ahwillia : I noticed that your fork of
dPCA adds a couple of improvements (setup.py & documentation). Would you be
willing to open a pull request to push these changes to our repository?
Also, should you implement dPCA in Julia, we could add a new subfolder for
this language.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#6 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAm20XK2v3lYOfSxM_kFHYYJAZMBDhG2ks5qsitdgaJpZM4KDS7g
.

from dpca.

Yes, that would be awesome! Looking forward.

from dpca.

Added MIT license.

from dpca.