Issues with random seed values about fooocus HOT 6 CLOSED

@lllyasviel I noticed you did initial version of fix in 1.0.35, but it could be improved a bit - instead of:

                def refresh_seed(r, s):
                    if r:
                        return random.randint(1, 1024*1024*1024)
                    else:
                        return s

in webui.py I'd go with

                def refresh_seed(r, s):
                    if r or not isinstance(s, int) or s < 0 or s > 2**63 - 1:
                        return random.randint(0, 2**63 - 1)
                    else:
                        return s

to refresh seed in case user entered value out of allowed range.

You could also bump max_seed in async_worker.py from 1024*1024*1024 to 2**63 - 1. People use 64-bit machines these days, and you already use similar values in core.py - I made all of them consistent, and staying in 0 to 2**63-1 range on my fork.

from fooocus.

negative or large seed will still work as they willl be preprocessed inner worker

from fooocus.

@lllyasviel They will work, but in your version they will be silently re-generated, and not displayed to the user in the UI.

from fooocus.

this impl cannot get same results from same negative number as seed

from fooocus.

It just generates new seed (from valid range) when out-of-range number is entered.

from fooocus.

Works fine in v2.1.739 (seeds from 0 to 2 ** 63 - 1 are now supported).

from fooocus.