Support for the Inpaint difference extension is very unstable about sd-webui-replacer HOT 2 CLOSED

Thanks for your message

Instead of being a full fledged tab

I like to use a dedicated tab, I think regular img2img tab is too complicated for my extension. The benefit of using all img2img scripts was questionable because it seems no one fit for inpainting except controlnet and tiled vae. And placing replacer tab next to other img2img tabs would break the idea of maximum fast inpaint. Later I decided to add custom mask and inpaint diff into advanced options just to have they there and take advantages of hires fix and cn inpainting

I just updated it like a week ago to add a few parameters to it, so in a sense, it is not a stable way to do this.

Yes, I understand it. It's an inevitable problem with using of any external extension. I think the best way I will fix it if you change something, like I'm doing for controlnet. Do not care about it. At least your development won't be endless 😃 idk how much new features are possible to add in your original idea

with a variable amount of parameters (*args) would be better, for example

It's impossible because if takes parametres from gradio's input

You could also highjack it, and run your extension when the compute_mask function returns?

This can solve a problem when an author changes returned variables, but for other cases it won't fix it as I see

from sd-webui-replacer.

I see, if you don't mind having to maintain the arguments, there's no problem then. I'll close the issue 👍
For new features in Inpaint difference, you never know! I keep thinking of new things to add to it :p
For example, I was thinking of adding an option to only return the inpainted masked region, and leave the rest of the image with full alpha when returning the image (to use as a layer in clip studio paint).

from sd-webui-replacer.