rewriting sentencing about laws HOT 3 CLOSED

The Judge would say which punishment for what as it is written in there. He has a list of punishments and he chooses which one he can use. In previous version there were only two possible punishments for each felony/misdemeanour, which is very limiting.

from laws.

as far as I understand what Jaromir said, we want the sentence of extradition/imprisonment to be strictly limited
plus we need to change 'a)' that gives definition under every offence because you marked 'a' imprisonment sentence and now it look like you give imprisonment for every offence (also Jaromir's remark)

from laws.

Well in next paragraph there is, that for felony the Judge can use anything he thinks is right and for misdemeanours everything except from imprisonment.
Moreover, imprisonment is in most countries basic punishment, witch is not used everytime, it is here just to discourage potential offender from committing the crime. So I see nothing bad in there.

But feel free to change it. I don't see any reason to change it, because still there is a strong Judge who should have the privilige to punish offenders strongly or softly depending on many factors which we cannot describe as the law would be very long...

from laws.