Quick cross build of pillar from amd64 to arm64 seems to be broken about eve HOT 5 CLOSED

Yes! I have had this open for a while.

Question: do we care if we build in alpine or Debian? The reason I ask is installing the cross-compilers. In alpine, you need to download the right cross-compiler, usually from https://musl.cc but there are others. It currently doesn't work because of URL changes.

In Debian, you can do something like:

RUN dpkg --add-architecture arm64
RUN apt update
RUN apt install -y binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu

and get what you need. Alpine explicitly does not package up cross-compilers and says they have no intention to do so (I checked last week again).

Of course, the final image is FROM alpine:3.8, so it should not affect the results (need to watch out for libc and dynamically linked dependencies).

from eve.

I believe we can't avoid building in alpine on account on musl. Remember that the goal here is to get A SINGLE zedbox binary cross-built and then use image linkuxkit file stanza to replace it in the final image.

from eve.

Remember that the goal here is to get A SINGLE zedbox binary cross-built

Yes, definitely. The only concern I would have is with libc (glibc vs must), and even then, only if it makes certain calls. I have done some projects that distribute on alpine but build on Debian, precisely because of the cross-building ease. Assuming we do statically linked (which we definitely should be doing), then that would be the only potential issue.

It is easy to test, of course. I will try to get to it.

The real issue here is the CGO. Without that, we don't need any of the cross-compilers, since go itself does it so well.

from eve.

@eriknordmark @deitch do we keep this or outdated? there was a PR recently #2998 so no issues expected.

from eve.

Correct @rouming and I can't reproduce this error anymore, let's close it.

from eve.