Visual overview of connections FNML about rml-fnml HOT 9 CLOSED

I kept capitalization in line with the (R2)RML specs, but no problem changing it. So maybe you could make the change or just add a note to remember to keep them in line with the final spec for now?

from rml-fnml.

my bad! uploaded an old version of the figure. This is what I pushed to the repository

from rml-fnml.

This is an interesting issue also for @anaigmo

from rml-fnml.

in fact, I see that the diagram in #8 in generalized so I guess we are just missing in this visualization.

from rml-fnml.

Shall we close this issue then? @samiscoding

from rml-fnml.

@bjdmeest what do you think about this modification in the figure?

from rml-fnml.

@samiscoding I don't get the replacement of function-valued term map with Output Term Map, and return with output . I don't think that's in line with the current draft.

from rml-fnml.

@samiscoding I don't get the replacement of function-valued term map with Output Term Map, and return with output . I don't think that's in line with the current draft.

Ah, good catch, I glossed over that! Yeah that part of the change is not in line with what was last agreed, namely to define it similar to constant-valued term map, template-valued term map, etc

from rml-fnml.

Perfect! Closing this as it's added in the spec (and Ana's diagram too :) )

from rml-fnml.