Product website / Repo about awesome-healthcare HOT 5 CLOSED

Having seperate links does make sense. I'll start the work for it;)

And to your question about openness, if there isnt source repo/clear licence/community I wouldnt consider it "open". For instance, what do you think about this http://www.openempi.org/

from awesome-healthcare.

Well I can't find any links to a repo. There is a news item about an AMI, and if you dug around in there you may find some source code? But I wouldn't include it in the list I think. As to your criteria I would agree with the first 2 (repo / open source licence) for inclusion, and publish some metric(s) on the community, but a community should not be a pre-requisite in my opinion.

from awesome-healthcare.

@mchapman I'm not sure we need multiple links per entry because:

1. This is not a pattern with the various awesome- repos on Github
2. It may be easy to find the project page/user documentation for a given project

Feel free to refute these points. I'm not 100% on one side.

@kakoni I just entered https://kenai.com/jira/browse/OPENEMPI-92 for OpenEMPI. Hoping they address this because it's a neat project.

Thanks,
Matthew

from awesome-healthcare.

Agree with @MatthewVita, we'll continue with the familar awesome- repo format.

from awesome-healthcare.

Just so this doesn't seem subjective: I put in a pull request to the master awesome repo. They have very specific criteria for lists and one of those items is one link per entry.

from awesome-healthcare.