Add different versions of C++ to CI about boolinq HOT 13 CLOSED

@mostafabarmshory code should be already compatible with these versions of C++ language 👌

from boolinq.

Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Started 3. Submitted 4. Done

This issue now has a funding of 0.03 ETH (110.54 USD @ $3684.59/ETH) attached to it.

• If you would like to work on this issue you can 'start work' on the Gitcoin Issue Details page.
• Want to chip in? Add your own contribution here.
• Questions? Checkout Gitcoin Help or the Gitcoin's Discord
• $6,059,532.63 more funded OSS Work available on the Gitcoin Issue Explorer

from boolinq.

@k06a
I start to test the compatibility.
However, I`m not very familiar with the project. I need a little time to figure it out.

from boolinq.

Greetings @mostafabarmshory 👋
I'm working on #64 which also involves expanding the project's CI pipeline to include all the same C++ versions as this issue. Since @k06a suggests this project is already compatible with these versions, it should be simple. However, if you run into any complications, don't be afraid to reach out and communicate as our work will overlap.

from boolinq.

Tanks you
@tylerferrara
No special problem. I just read and had some tutorials in Travis CI. I was looking for a way to run Travis Build CI locally. I saw your discussion about AppVeyor.
Can you tell me more about it?

from boolinq.

Dear @k06a and @tylerferrara
I did with C++-11 and updated the Travis config. But I could not test it with travis itself right now. It dose not start the build process due to the following error:

We are unable to start your build at this time. You exceeded the number of users allowed for your plan. Please review your plan details and follow the steps to resolution.

I asked Travis support to check my account. I`ll push changes as soon as they enable my account and it pass all my tests.

from boolinq.

@mostafabarmshory try to open PR to this repo, I’ll try to start CI

from boolinq.

Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Started 3. Submitted 4. Done

Work has been started.

These users each claimed they can complete the work by 264 years, 3 months from now.
Please review their action plans below:

1) xav83 has been approved to start work.

Hi @k06a,

Before I can start to work on this issue, I have a few questions:

• Do you have a Travis account linked to the repository boolinq ? (This would allow me to iterate on the Travis setup directly with your final CI process)
• Does this issue concerns only the tests ? Or does it also concerns the bench ?
• Do you already have some specific command or argument to compile the project with each of the C++ standard ? Or do I have to adapt the CMakeLists.txt files to be able to switch the C++ standard used ?

Thank you in advance for you answer,

Have a great day :-)

Learn more on the Gitcoin Issue Details page.

from boolinq.

Hi @k06a,

Before I can start to work on this issue, I have a few questions:

• Do you have a Travis account linked to the repository boolinq ? (This would allow me to iterate on the Travis setup directly with your final CI process)
• Does this issue concerns only the tests ? Or does it also concerns the bench ?
• Do you already have some specific command or argument to compile the project with each of the C++ standard ? Or do I have to adapt the CMakeLists.txt files to be able to switch the C++ standard used ?

Thank you in advance for you answer,

Have a great day :-)

from boolinq.

@Xav83 hi!

1. Yes I have Travis CI, but maybe better to use GitHub Actions, since it supports all the major operating systems and compilers?
2. I think we can have both
3. Please suggest what you think is better for the library, I do not have much experience with project configuration

from boolinq.

Hi @k06a,

If you want, I can use GitHub Actions instead of Travis CI.
Since it is directly integrated in GitHub and developed by GitHub, I would suggest you to indeed choose GitHub Actions.

I'll wait for you choice before starting the work on one or the other CI. 😉
If you choose GitHub Actions, could you update the description of the Gitcoin issue ?

from boolinq.

@Xav83 I think GitHub Actions is good enough, let's switch to it.

from boolinq.

Hi @k06a,

I have create a Pull Request draft which adds a GitHub Action workflow to compile boolinq-test with all the C++ versions.
I have 2 new questions:

• Do you want GitHub Actions to test the compilation with several compilers ? Or the one by default is enough ?
  • -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 9.4.0
• For now, I only run boolinq-test on GitHub Actions. Do you want me to also run boolinq-test14 ? And boolinq-bench ?

If you want, we can also discuss about that directly on the Pull Request #76 😉

from boolinq.