Citations in parentheses have a period before the close parentheses about citeproc HOT 6 CLOSED

On pandoc-discuss, you said that notes in parentheses are first formatted, and then adjusted for being in parentheses, and that the heuristic for removing a final period seems not the be working in this case.

I think it would be better to let the formatter know in advance that the note will be in parentheses. In this case, it could simply omit the final punctuation specified on the cs:layout element. Then there wouldn't be any need for a heuristic to decide whether the note ends with an abbreviation or not. It would also allow for better handling of parentheses in the note: the Chicago Manual of Style recommends brackets within parentheses instead of parentheses within parentheses. I don't know if CSL 1.0.1 deals with that, but if not, perhaps 1.0.2 or 1.1 does. I found a July 30, 2009 post from Frank Bennet in the Zotero forum saying that he would add it to the new version of citeproc-js.

Addendum: I tested citations in parentheses with Zotero 5.0.92. It doesn't wrap citations in notes in parentheses automatically, but if parentheses are used as the prefix and suffix, then square brackets are used instead of parentheses in the citation.

from citeproc.

I remember there have been some discussions regarding this...

from citeproc.

Ok, the relevant discussion seems to be here.
Concerning parentheses-to-brackets-flip-flopping: citation-style-language/documentation#118

So, it's quite clear that this has to be addressed somehow.

from citeproc.

I guess we'll have to wait for CSL changes to fully resolve the issue.
But in the mean time I can see if there's a more reliable way to remove the dot when it needs removing, and not when it doesn't...

from citeproc.

I've pushed a fix to pandoc that solves the final period issue.
I'll close this issue, but a new issue should be opened when CSL decides on a strategy for dealing with parenthesis flipping etc.

from citeproc.

Great that this is resolved for now. The more general problem is this: pandoc offers more options for citation formatting than citeproc-js. It already goes beyond the spec in offering multiple citation modes, which perfectly makes sense here. Different environments, different constraints...

from citeproc.