Grad strides do not match bucket view strides about transgeo2022 HOT 5 CLOSED

This is weird, are you training on GPU? Why set GPU to 0?

from transgeo2022.

This is weird, are you training on GPU? Why set GPU to 0?

Thanks for your reply, let me describe my test process.
The GPU is not set initially, and os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"] =”0”.However, the server has a total of 0-7 available, so running this will directly runerror

CUDA error: invalid device ordinal

Then os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"]=”0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7”,here's the problem:

Grad strides do not match bucket view strides.

And there's no loss or mean-N value. Print args.gpu before training, the value is 0. So I set --gpu 0 .

from transgeo2022.

This is weird. When using os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"] =”0”, only GPU-0 will be visible. There is no need to set --gpu 0. I did not get anything like this. It might be a CUDA or pytorch version issue?

from transgeo2022.

Thanks, the problem has been solved. For the VIGOR and CVUSA data sets, the pytorch environment is quite different, and the results can be produced after replacement. However, there are still some problems, such as dim sets the dimension in sampler, whether the dim setting is the same result after embedding in the Transgeo network, at the same time, the dim in file is set to 1000, but default is 128, for these data sets, how many is better, 4096,1000,or 128?

from transgeo2022.

Thanks, the problem has been solved. For the VIGOR and CVUSA data sets, the pytorch environment is quite different, and the results can be produced after replacement. However, there are still some problems, such as dim sets the dimension in sampler, whether the dim setting is the same result after embedding in the Transgeo network, at the same time, the dim in file is set to 1000, but default is 128, for these data sets, how many is better, 4096,1000,or 128?

Please follow the parameters in the provided script to reproduce the result.

from transgeo2022.