[clinical] Add column to point to the dataset/table from the dictionary about etl HOT 8 CLOSED

We are copying the CPTAC BQ table into per collection tables in our clinical dataset and recording the source BQ table in the table_metadata table. Suggest we can close this issue

from etl.

Table name is now recorded literally in the clinical_meta and clinical_summary tables, ie no 'dereferencing' needed. Project and dataset are no recorded literally in the clinical_meta table.
But the project and dataset columns should be moved from clinical_meta to clinical_summary. clinical_summary has table level meta information about the clinical tables, while clinical_meta has column level meta information about the clinical tables

from etl.

I am assuming the table names changed to be clinical_meta_table and clinical_meta_column. But it looks like we do not have any collections that would rely on tables from other projects integrated into this right now (ie, neither CPTAC nor TCGA collections are included). Should we go through the steps to integrate at least some project that relies on external tables to make sure the architecture of how things are working and organized can support external sources? Did we decide if we would replicate those external tables under versioned dataset, or indeed include external references?

from etl.

I think we have not made a decision with respect to referencing or just duplicating external sources.

from etl.

I propose duplicating external sources. Those tables should not be large, and if we do not duplicate them, they can disappear or change at any moment.

from etl.

Sure. I expect ISB-CGC is the only other entity pulling relevant data into BigQuery. In addition to CPTAC I know an ISB colleague will be gathering HTAN clinical data into BigQuery.

from etl.

Just one clarification question. Currently, the source of CPTAC tables points to current (isb-cgc-bq.CPTAC.clinical_gdc_current). In a few months from now, it might be the case that current will be different. Can you discuss with the ISB-CGC folks if it makes sense to point to the actual numbered/versioned table instead of current, and note the response here?

from etl.

Superseded by #40

from etl.