Issue with using `required_with` for nested objects about validation-composite HOT 3 CLOSED

https://github.com/illuminatech/validation-composite/blame/master/README.md#L153-L154

from validation-composite.

@klimov-paul I understand your point, however what I failed to mention in the issue is the usage of \Illuminate\Contracts\Validation\ImplicitRule. This interface can be used for making custom rule classes be validated in the same way as implicit rules (see this and this).

However, even when using the interface the validation still fails due to the issue I explained above.

What I was suggesting is refactoring the package to work with the ImplicitRule, that way the rules mentioned in the readme would be able to be used in composite rules as long as it implements the said interface.

Sorry for forgetting to mention this in the original post.

from validation-composite.

@klimov-paul Any thoughts on my comment?

from validation-composite.