Common math function support? about hemi HOT 4 CLOSED

This could indeed be useful. Please see the discussion on #6 though. Portability is very important here, so a good design is important. I welcome pull requests. Thanks!

from hemi.

I'm a bit torn on whether to look at this from the CUDA side or the host. I suspect it would be easier to use the math function names. This way, the functionality is clear (especially w/r/t rounding). Going the other way (from functions in to API is more natural to program in, but there's a pile of very specific functions with different rounding behaviors.

Right now, I've got everything as templated inline functions. Interesting side effect is that when the compiler is evaluating what template to use when the result of ?: is being passed to a function, the output is a bit weird when the types differ slightly (like a signed/unsigned int). It's fixable via typecasting, though.

On a related note, is there a preference as to a framework to use for writing testcases for some of these additions to Hemi?

from hemi.

See #10 for a pull request for this.

from hemi.

I would probably use google test, BTW (haven't looked at pull request yet).

from hemi.