Inconsistency between active power lower bounds and time-series of area loads about rts-gmlc HOT 1 OPEN

It's known that the real-time load is quite bad. There are a number of discrepancies between the day-ahead and real-time load profiles that represent unrealistically large forecast errors. However, I think the issue that you present is one that requires a commitment adjustment to maintain feasibility. If I understand your issue, you are trying to run an ACOPF with all units committed. I have no expectation that the "commit all" solution is feasible for all setpoints. However, I'm also aware that the current day-ahead, and real-time load, wind, and solar profiles along with the defined reserve requirements also do not always result in a feasible commitment pattern (see #129 , #114). Finally, I'm also aware that the the (lack of) reactive power time series, and the network design itself is not sufficient to support the wind and solar penetration that has been added to the system.
PRs are welcome to address some of these issues

from rts-gmlc.