Comments (12)
@ewa-rudnicka and @fcbond are still hashing out if some of the relations should be symmetric or appear in pairs. Probably only the synonym and antonym relations should be symmetric.
from gwadoc.
Basic documentation added by b4dbc8c
from gwadoc.
A couple of comments on the implementation of these new relationships:
- Could we lose the
_of
from property names likeaugmentative_of
? This would fit the style better simple_aspect_pi
andsecondary_aspect_pi
are marked as not directly applicable. So what is the point of them??ir_synonym
is allowed between senses, but its parent relationship is not. This is a contradiction. I think thatir_synonym
should not be allowed between senses- Similarly,
simple_aspect_ip
andsecondary_aspect_ip
are allowed between synsets, but not between its parentderivation
. Again this is contradictory and we should probably not allow this.
from gwadoc.
A couple of comments on the implementation of these new relationships:
- Could we lose the
_of
from property names likeaugmentative_of
? This would fit the style better
I also prefer without _of
, but I'm not sure we have a consistent style. Here are some existing relations with of
:
state_of
⇔be_in_state
subevent
⇔is_subevent_of
manner_of
⇔in_manner
Similarly, these by
ones are inconsistent:
restricts
⇔restricted_by
entails
⇔is_entailed_by
Maybe we could use some relation naming guidelines.
simple_aspect_pi
andsecondary_aspect_pi
are marked as not directly applicable. So what is the point of them??
"(not directly applicable)" is what is shown by the HTML templates when a relation is not marked as a synset-synset, sense-sense, or sense-synset relation (e.g., for constitutive
). My guess is that someone forgot to mark these relations as such. Otherwise I'd agree that there's no point. I think for "constitutive", which is not defined in the DTD, it is only there to group related relations as a supertype. Maybe it should go?
ir_synonym
is allowed between senses, but its parent relationship is not. This is a contradiction. I think thatir_synonym
should not be allowed between senses
I see the logical argument, and also I think it's easier to start with a tight schema then loosen it later than vice versa. However, in the Japanese Wordnet we have words sharing a synset where some are interregister synonyms (e.g., 召し上がる, 召しあがる, 召上る (yes, three of them), 召される, 召す, 上がる, 食事, 食む, 食らう, 食う, 食べる, 食する, and 頂く all share a synset). These cannot be modeled with a synset-only relation. But maybe adapting the schema to the data we have is putting the cart before the horse and we should instead change the data (e.g., splitting those into different synsets)?
- Similarly,
simple_aspect_ip
andsecondary_aspect_ip
are allowed between synsets, but not between its parentderivation
. Again this is contradictory and we should probably not allow this.
Ditto my first sentence from (3) above. I don't have any opinion or counterexamples otherwise.
I have another related concern:
- I find the
_form
relations (feminine_form
,masculine_form
, etc.) slightly odd. Why are we talking about "form" at the synset level? That seems like a word (or sense) thing. Why not justfeminine
,masculine
, etc.?
from gwadoc.
Yes, for 1 and 5 I also prefer shorter names.
On 3, I think that this is something that should be fixed in Japanese WordNet, Typically, register changes (e.g., 'bloke' vs 'man') are different synsets in wordnets.
from gwadoc.
from gwadoc.
from gwadoc.
from gwadoc.
Just confirming that ir_synonym
is changed to synset-synset and not sense-sense as written above?
Also, I see that you've changed masculine
to male
and feminine
to female
. My qualm was with using the _form
suffix, not with the masculine
/feminine
part. There are times that the grammatical gender does not match the natural gender (for example, from Wikipedia, cailín "girl" (Irish) is masculine), so male
/female
might be problematic. Which are we annotating?
from gwadoc.
from gwadoc.
from gwadoc.
Will do
from gwadoc.
Related Issues (20)
- Clarify the description of underspecified relations HOT 5
- Suppress empty fields HOT 4
- Create Documentations for Constitutive, Instance Hyponym, Instance Hypernym, Antonym, Equal Synonym,Similar HOT 3
- Create documentation for Co-role relation groups and the last three HOT 3
- Create documentation for Other and it's sub-members
- Contributing HOT 2
- Create the Overview section HOT 1
- Add link to short examples
- Open Wordnet Documentation website redesign HOT 3
- Change symbol from a LANGUAGE to a PART HOT 1
- Change master branch to main
- schemas vs gwadoc
- Create Chinese documentation
- Do we mean syntactic or semantic diminutives? HOT 2
- "hammer classifies teapot" HOT 4
- Inconsistencies for Meronymy/Holonymy HOT 3
- No inverse relation for similar/near_synonym (i.e. near_antonym) HOT 3
- is_entailed_by showing incorrect reversed relation HOT 1
- Hyponym example is wrong
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from gwadoc.