JOSS package review about bcea HOT 2 CLOSED

The books have both been peer reviewed before it was published (over and above the post-publication comments and reviews). I have a paper in Journal of Statistical Software (to appear) for survHE, but not one for BCEA. At this stage, I'm not sure another paper on the software would contribute much more, though, I think --- given the point above about the books...

Closing this also, but as usual, happy to keep discussing.

from bcea.

Fair enough.

My point was that this would be a review of the code, not the methods or application. Unless I am wrong neither the review of the book or the paper will have looked at the code/documentation extensively? A JOSS review checks that code and docs meet community best practices.

In JOSS the paper is a half-page abstract -the review looks at the code.

Example paper and review.

from bcea.