Parse version specifications about gemfileparser HOT 9 OPEN

Would you be ok with that being used here?

Yes, I have no objection.

It is a bit confusing to have two repos with issues available on both. GitLab projects can have MRs and issues de-activated if you want it to be a mirror only.

No. I plan on using GitLab as the source of truth, not GitHub. I will port existing issues and disable issues here.

from gemfileparser.

dephell/dephell_specifier#3 provides a good library for handling the version specifications.

Would you be ok with that being used here?

from gemfileparser.

https://github.com/mswart/debler/blob/c3ff2165d155ff3c10446d8f4de62ebc922094c7/debler/bundler/builder.py and https://github.com/mswart/debler/blob/c3ff2165d155ff3c10446d8f4de62ebc922094c7/debler/bundler/parser.py seem to be quite complete.

https://github.com/coi-gov-pl/puppeter/blob/04e2a2008bd89a0429b734fdde6da83813688865/puppeter/domain/model/gemrequirement.py#L98 is simpler than any of the above, but looks quite good.

from gemfileparser.

PRs are welcome. I don't think I will have enough free time anytime soon to sit down and work on this.

from gemfileparser.

Would you be able to do a release if a good quality parser and test suite is added?

from gemfileparser.

@jayvdb Yes. We can cut a new release once this is implemented.

from gemfileparser.

Also see https://gitlab.com/balasankarc/gemfileparser/issues/3 It is a bit confusing to have two repos with issues available on both. GitLab projects can have MRs and issues de-activated if you want it to be a mirror only.

from gemfileparser.

Another approach is to use https://github.com/d9pouces/RubyMarshal , but be aware of d9pouces/RubyMarshal#3

from gemfileparser.

@jayvdb hey 👋 good to see you here too! I am co-maintaining this now together with @rpotter12 FWIW.

from gemfileparser.