ref, complexType in element-tag, documentation in non-leaf-tags about xsd2json HOT 3 OPEN

Yes, the aim is to extend xsd2json step by step. Currently I'm working on the integration of xs:import and xs:include with its multiple schema support.

The best way to get things fixed is to provide some concrete examples. Feel free to open a pull request containing only some test cases in the /test/xsd and /test/json directories. The ref support should not be that hard, xs:documentation and xs:annotation too. What do you mean by your last bullet point?

from xsd2json.

Current status:

• ref-attributes in element-tags
• the documentation-attibute in a complexType
• complexTypes in element-tags
• complexType extension

from xsd2json.

@fnogatz I have an xs:complexType that does not appear in the JSON schema. Does that fall under this issue? It looks like this:

    <xs:complexType name="DocumentLineType1Choice">
        <xs:choice>
            <xs:element name="Cd" type="ExternalDocumentLineType1Code"/>
            <xs:element name="Prtry" type="Max35Text"/>
        </xs:choice>
    </xs:complexType>

FYI, I was just looking into this tool since we're interested in a JSON Schema for some of the ISO 20022 messages. They are quite big and complex, so you might be interested in them, perhaps as some kind of benchmark (the conversion took several minutes). This is one of the XSD's, the one that I'm currently looking into:
https://www.iso20022.org/documents/messages/pacs/schemas/pacs.008.001.06.zip

from xsd2json.