Conan package about sqlite_orm HOT 13 CLOSED

Thanks to @AlexandrePTJ , the package is in good shape with the 1.0 release, and has been submitted for inclusion into Conan-Center. Here it is represented and available in Bincrafters repository (in case you want to link to it on your readme or something).

https://bintray.com/bincrafters/public-conan/sqlite_orm%3Abincrafters

from sqlite_orm.

Hi,

As I use sqlite_orm in a new project with conan, I created the package here: conan-sqlite_orm
However to follow a regular way for packaging, I think that including semantic versionning might be a good idea.

Thanks for good work on sqlite_orm anyway !

from sqlite_orm.

I think I can. Let me look trough Conan details and I'll be back with a detailed answer

from sqlite_orm.

@zamazan4ik maybe you know someone who can solve the issue? It can take long time for me to do it by myself cause I never use Conan.

BTW I move to Minsk next week

from sqlite_orm.

Bincrafters team can do it. It's open community for making Conan recipes. But Bincrafters has lack of human resources :-( It's the only reason why i ask to every library author with only one question - "Please, make Conan package" :-)

BTW I move to Minsk next week

Nice, i will be in Minsk too :-)

from sqlite_orm.

Hey, this is a very good news! Thank you very much. What is required from me to finalize this issue? What do you mean "semantic versionning" exactly?

from sqlite_orm.

There is nothing to do more to finalize this issue.
Semantic versionning is guidelines to explain how to manage version numbers. This is explained here: https://semver.org/

from sqlite_orm.

@AlexandrePTJ do you expect posting a release per every version in releases section in github or something else?
@zamazan4ik please check out the conan package and close the issue if everything is fine.
@AlexandrePTJ is there a way to add unit tests for this?
@AlexandrePTJ do we need to put conan file into repo?

from sqlite_orm.

Yes package will be updated with each version of sqlite_orm.

In the process of package creation with conan, there is a step named "test_package". This is usualy is simple main which include the library but it can execute unit tests.

From my opinion, conan stuff should stay in a separate repo. That way, the library repo stay clear and packaging can evolve with disturbing library development.

from sqlite_orm.

so everyone who wants to use sqlite_orm with conan will need to clone your repo? Or I got to fork it anyway?

from sqlite_orm.

Not exactly.
Now the recipe is written, I submit it to @bincrafters and to the public repository conan-transit.
The first is to put the recipe in "good pratices" process and to maybe to makes it release under a recognized community.
The second one, is to allow anyone using conan to add the package as a dependency of its project. This is done by just adding "sqlite_orm/1.0.0@alexandreptj/stable" in a text file, then conan do all the magic (download, build if needed, install, references, ...)

from sqlite_orm.

@AlexandrePTJ that's very cool. Thank you very much. I should take much time for me if I do it.

from sqlite_orm.

closing cause issue creator isn't responding but the issue is closed

from sqlite_orm.