Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (2)

Ro5s avatar Ro5s commented on September 3, 2024 1

Yeah, CC0 has the most fulsome waiver language I've seen. Seems appropriate here (dealing with situation where some countries don't recognize releasing work into pub domain...). Advantages with retaining MIT seem to be (i) short and simple, (ii) widely used (comfort zone), + (iii) preserves copyright and legal notice. This author also had some interesting criticisms of CC0 vs. MIT on international perspective - - basically, CC0's fulsome language can be a double-edged sword by attempting, e.g., to waive certain 'moral rights' in Section 1(ii) (not copacetic in Norway, among others....).

At risk of veering into full navel-gazing territory: Open Source Initiative has a sorta ambivalent FAQ on this subject, as well, noting: "CC0 was not explicitly rejected, but the License Review Committee was unable to reach consensus that it should be approved, and Creative Commons eventually withdrew the application. The most serious of the concerns raised had to do with the effects of clause 4(a), which reads: 'No ... patent rights held by Affirmer are waived, abandoned, surrendered, licensed or otherwise affected by this document.'. While many open source licenses simply do not mention patents, it is exceedingly rare for open source licenses to explicitly disclaim any conveyance of patent rights, and the Committee felt that approving such a license would set a dangerous precedent, and possibly even weaken patent infringement defenses available to users of software released under CC0."

Edit: So, I think concern about CC0's patent language is less relevant for LearnPlasma. My bias however, would be to stick with MIT due to its (i) simplicity, (ii) lacks cloud of uncertainty.

These are pretty nifty comparisons on granular level: MIT vs. CC0.

from learn-plasma.

smartcontracts avatar smartcontracts commented on September 3, 2024 1

@Ro5s This is actually extremely interesting! I wasn't aware of any of these arguments and exactly how difficult it is to dedicate something into the public domain. Well, I think that's a strong argument to keep MIT instead of to move to CC0.

from learn-plasma.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.