Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 48 Agenda about pm HOT 5 CLOSED

Thanks for investigating @eggy-eth I have closed them both as false positives, but I hope you continue to try to find flaws in the implementations!

from pm.

Please allow time for flirting, weed smoking and price talk.

from pm.

I'd like to point out that when I tested geth it does not look like it is EIP-1014 compliant. I wonder if it has been tested, since it seems like the tests are there?

CREATE2 can re-run constructor multiple times in a selfdestructed contract

CREATE2 can be ran twice creating code at the same address instead of reverting

EDIT: This hence might be a reason for another delay in the HF since my gut says that there will be consensus issues between parity/geth if it is not implemented according to EIP 1014 in geth so far.

EDIT: I have understood EIP 1014 wrong and hence thought these were issues while they are not.

from pm.

Can't join the call, so here an update from EthereumJS on Constantinople:

We are making good progress and now have substantial parts of all EIPs implemented - latest merging the SSTORE implementation. So I am somewhat confident that we can do a Constantinople-ready release of the VM within the next 1-2 weeks.

from pm.

Closing in favor of #60

from pm.