For Third-party Model incorporation into the Hub about ersilia HOT 15 CLOSED

Benefit of the model should be added to the template.
Benefit: How can the model be of benefit in the field of science?

from ersilia.

This issue is in response to issue #15 made by Gemma asking for an issue template to request a model.

I hope to make more meaningful contributions

from ersilia.

I would love to contribute to this issue.

from ersilia.

thanks @ifeoluwafavour for the contribution!

@victorabba if there is something you wish to add to please do so in this conversation thread. It will remain open for the week for any further contributions. It may be there is no further information to add, if you think that is the case, let me know so I can close the issue and check for other open issues to contribute to.

from ersilia.

Their is actually something missing. I will attend to it.

from ersilia.

Benefit of the model should be added to the template.
Benefit: How can the model be of benefit in the field of science?

Thank you for contribution @victorabba
I don't know if I should include it because it would look like my contribution when you added the "benefit of the model" clause

from ersilia.

You can go ahead and make the changes.

from ersilia.

Hello @ifeoluwafavour and @victorabba for your contributions.

I think this is an interesting discussion. The question How can the model be of benefit in the field of science? is perhaps to general. Could you think of a way of rephrasing it so that it is more narrow?
For example, instead of how it can benefit the field of science - why is it relevant to the Ersilia Mission.

from ersilia.

Okay. Thank you @GemmaTuron

Can I put it like this:

Third-party Model's Relevance to Ersilia's Mission
State how the third-party model is relevant to Ersilia's Mission

from ersilia.

I would love to add some more points to at what @ifeoluwafavour had contributed.

We can add 'Test Case' and 'Flexibility and limitations' .

Test Case which would basically include the input and the output format and the parameters to make the model even more clear to users while testing and get an idea of the exact keyword to be tested for.

Flexibility and limitations would include any boundary condition when this model can be used if required. Also it will include the margin of error if any as limitation if is already being encountered while deploying the model.

@GemmaTuron I would be glad if you consider this and suggest if I am missing out on something or is there anything you want to add.

from ersilia.

Thank you @SHRIYA1706 for your suggestion

from ersilia.

Hi @GemmaTuron this discussion is great. We need to nominate one or a few assignees here (right bar).

from ersilia.

Hello!

@ifeoluwafavour thanks for the clarification. @victorabba I would like you to also think about my question and answer it here so I can close the issue!
@SHRIYA1706 I think the test case might be a bit too much to ask of contributors simply for suggesting a model, but adding a clause about the limitations of the model would be interesting, thanks.

@victorabba please make your suggestion and then I will close this issue and modify the template accordingly

from ersilia.

Benefit of the model: How can the third party model help Ersilia to achieve it's goals?
Tips:
1 Is it scientifically or medically related?
2 Does it provide a basis for disease prediction?

from ersilia.

Hi @victorabba
Thanks for the answers. I have been doing some thinking, I think relevant questions could be:

• What stage of the drug discovery cascade is your model contributing to?
• Describe the dataset used to train the model. @SHRIYA1706 this is a better way to understand the limitations of the model (i,e data comes from a very specific experiment, pulls from various ones, which size..)

I will cose this issue and modify the template with your suggestions!

from ersilia.