README.md Wrong about geolix HOT 3 CLOSED

I tried to word it in a way that someone reading it on Hex is not confused and I don't have to modify it for upcoming versions. Should be good enough for now. And as a new release is around the corner the current problem will vanish for some time anyway :D

from geolix.

You are probably looking for the README of the tag you are using (GitHub and HexDocs).

The dependency statement is valid for real releases and not the 0.11.0-dev only available via GitHub. Rest assured you are not the only one tripping over that :D

Could you think of some statement I could include to mention that difference? Might help to prevent the confusion...

from geolix.

Yeah I was able to find the correct docs in the README found from the hex package under my deps directory, and from there everything worked great, so thanks for building a solid working package!

As far as including a statement, I am really bad at writing these types of things but maybe in include something along the lines of:

Documentation below is for the 0.11.0-dev release. Please see <insert some link or instructions here> for documentation for ~> 0.10 releases.

By the way, I am very excited about 0.11 after exploring the source code and docs for both versions! Cannot wait for the release, and thank you for working on this package!

from geolix.