XDG base dirs? about ntfy HOT 6 CLOSED

What are the pros? Is this like the new hotness for config files?

To me seems like overkill (but maybe I missed the point)

If it's to support multiple targets, I'd rather have the concept of targets
within a single config so I don't have to repeat credentials and maintain
them in multiple places

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Daniel Schep [email protected]
wrote:

Should I use XDG Base dirs for the config? EG: ~/.config/ntfy/ntfy.yml
instead of ~/.ntfy.yml. Use ~/Library/Appplication Support/ntfy/ntfy.yml
on Mac?

ref:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3373948/equivalents-of-xdg-config-home-and-xdg-data-home-on-mac-os-x

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#20.

from ntfy.

Cleaner home dir & more up to date conventions, nothing to do with our discussions around multiple targets and just using multiple configs. I probably won't ever implement this 😛

from ntfy.

I support this for two reasons:

1. cleaner home dir
2. Those that backup ./config won't have to also include .ntfy

Thanks for the consideration!

from ntfy.

Duly noted @jungle-boogie. I guess ntfy could just support both XDG(or other OS equivalents) and ~/.ntfy.yml locations. With.. the XDG style taking precedence i guess since it's more "correct."

from ntfy.

+1

from ntfy.

Note, the solution merged in e01c65d retains backwards compatibility with ~/.ntfy.yml config files, but prefers OS specific locations (such as ~/.config/ntfy/ntfy.yml on Linux).

from ntfy.