separate scope for mixins? about less-sublime HOT 5 CLOSED

I think classes should all look the same, because they're all classes. But perhaps I can look into a regex for mixins that end with ; and ( ... is that along the lines of what you where thinking?

from less-sublime.

I agree with you. Perhaps only the ones where they end with ";", since
that's where the class is being used not defined? I expect the
definition of a class mixin to be like any other class. It's just when you
use it inside another class (or other selector) that it starts to look
confusing. But I defer to your judgement on this.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Dan Rogers <
[email protected]

wrote:

I think classes should all look the same, because they're all classes. But
perhaps I can look into a regex for mixins that end with ; and ( ... is
that along the lines of what you where thinking?

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#7 (comment)

from less-sublime.

I also want to be able to see mixins in different color. You can add another scope name like entity.mixin.less.
can't wait to have this feature

from less-sublime.

Hey guys, just an update on this. I won't have time in the near future, but pull requests are more than welcome.

from less-sublime.

@smlombardi this should now be available in master, thanks to @aziz.

In order for the scope to be applied, you must use your mixins like this:
.ie7-inline-block();

Otherwise, if you omit the () it will use the css class scope. I like this, as it makes using mixins more explicit.

from less-sublime.