bicyle=yes rendering about cyclosm-cartocss-style HOT 2 OPEN

For example, the wiki suggests using it for these paths or signs: example https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Australia_road_sign_R8-1.svg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Z239ZZ1022_10GehwegRadfahrerFrei1.jpg

I'm not sure to understand why this would be tagged as explicit highway=path + bicycle=yes, given that this is already the default implication from highway=path. Especially in Australia where the wiki is quite clear about it.

Most explicit bicycle=yes tagging I am aware of are usually on different highway values with no bicycle=yes implicit access restrictions (such as highway=footway). From a worldwide perspective, adding bicycle=yes on a highway=path should not convey much more information.

From the page on implied default access restrictions, adding an explicit bicycle=yes tag to highway=path should convey extra meaning only in Austria.

from cyclosm-cartocss-style.

I agree with @Phyks. To me, these signs:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Australia_road_sign_R8-1.svg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Z239ZZ1022_10GehwegRadfahrerFrei1.jpg

means the way should be tagged with bicycle=designated

from cyclosm-cartocss-style.