Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (4)

cyanreg avatar cyanreg commented on May 29, 2024

Its closed source, hasn't got specifications, it's badly executed, and there are dubious legal aspects to holding recovery data on a server and distributing it for free (these days even publicizing a checksum of copyrighted data is enough to get in trouble).
Not happening.

from cyanrip.

dhouck avatar dhouck commented on May 29, 2024

I’ve also been looking at using CUETools (the software not just the database) so I find some of that alarming.

What part of it is closed source? It looks like the client and even the server are open source, although yeah there doesn’t seem to be a spec (not that I can find a spec or source code for AccurateRip either).

More importantly, I’m curious what’s badly executed about it; as I said I’m not familiar with the technical side of this. I saw a reference somewhere to a weird checksum algorithm but it sounds like you mean more than that?

from cyanrip.

cyanreg avatar cyanreg commented on May 29, 2024

If you're going to write a piece of code to correct errors, you don't start by rolling your own. Not when so many error correction codes already approach the Shannon limit. And generally, you won't find anything better than Raptor(Q), since 2011/5, which is also an IETF standard.
Either way, I'm leaving it for someone else to implement. Generally, drives leave very little for programs to correct, and often, they simply won't output anything and freeze if they find something truly unreadable, at which point the entire rip is gone. If you're going to be downloading dubiously legal error code data, may as well download dubiously legal rips too.

from cyanrip.

calestyo avatar calestyo commented on May 29, 2024

Having CTDB support would IMO mainly be interesting as another layer of verification (especially as it often takes quite a while for data to get into AR).

AFAICS, the code is fully open?

As for the concerns about copyright issues. According to their website they store 180KB of recovery data. If that would already be enough for copyright infringement is questionable (but I'm no lawyer).

But shouldn't one be on the safe side if one simple doesn't implement that part of functionality and never download the recovery data? All what's then left is checksums, like with AR.

from cyanrip.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.