Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (4)

chettrick avatar chettrick commented on June 21, 2024

Hello, thanks for your suggestion about adding support for the SAM D51.

From my cursory view, Microchip's software offer for that chip series is licensed as either Apache 2.0 or a BSD-like license with an exclusive-use clause.
Such non-free licensed software, including software licensed under GPL, LGPL, EPL, CDDL, and so on, will not be included in DiscoBSD.

I will leave this Issue open, in the hope that a suitably licensed chip and board support package is discovered or independently developed. I appreciate any suggestions.

Thanks,
Christopher Hettrick

from discobsd.

amarkee avatar amarkee commented on June 21, 2024

For clarification on the license, is the Apache 2.0 a problem? The device headers and linker scripts appear to be Apache 2.0 while the drivers (Harmony or ASF) are under the exclusive-use clause. Harmony and ASF aren't worth the time, so not being able to use them wouldn't be a big loss. This could be a port I could take on once I familiarize myself with the code base a bit more.

from discobsd.

chettrick avatar chettrick commented on June 21, 2024

@amarkee Yes, the Apache 2.0 license is a problem. See https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html and the rationale under Specific Cases for Apache.

DiscoBSD adopts, in general, the OpenBSD approach to software licensing.

The big issue that will be faced in the future is that the CMSIS files from Arm for Cortex-M33 devices and newer devices are also Apache 2.0, and no BSD-style license exists for them that I could find.

For clarity, there currently are issues with the licensing of some utilities inherited from RetroBSD, such as the virus editor and lcc. A licensing audit will be performed once the codebase is in a stable form that is receptive for a sort of Ports Collection for transferring the third party utilities to.

from discobsd.

amarkee avatar amarkee commented on June 21, 2024

@chettrick Thank you for the clarification. There are so many different definitions of what constitutes free and non-free software it's good to have clear license guidelines. I will shelve this port for now and keep researching solutions.

from discobsd.

Related Issues (6)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.