repoctl status -u vs -m about repoctl HOT 8 CLOSED

Hi @allspark, thanks for the report, I'll look into it as soon as possible.

from repoctl.

Hi @allspark, the semantics of repoctl changed significantly 😬 when I switched over to a different command line library. So perhaps I should have written up a list of the changes from the previous version.

For the status subcommand, there is no -u option though.
Can you tell me what you are expecting to see?

from repoctl.

oh sorry, i meant status -a (not -u)

with -a i see (atm) 3 packages
with -m i see a lot of line like repoctl: !aur

from repoctl.

You're right, -m should imply -a.

from repoctl.

I correct myself: -m should result in AUR being consulted for all the packages.

from repoctl.

Btw, you can combine -a and -m: repoctl status -am.

from repoctl.

ah thx 👍

from repoctl.

@allspark, I released 0.15, which contains this fix among others.

from repoctl.