Add support for x86-64 decompilation about boomerang HOT 5 OPEN

@nemerle Perhaps milestones would suit this better. Adding an architecture is several months in the making.

from boomerang.

Well, for now it's just a wish, since milestone would mean that we're actually going to implement it 😄

from boomerang.

True, although I wouldn't rule out someone committing a feature branch.
On Mar 29, 2016 7:02 AM, "Artur K." [email protected] wrote:

Well, for now it's just a wish, since milestone would mean that we're
actually going to implement it [image: 😄]

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#49 (comment)

from boomerang.

Note, the AMD64 Architecture's Programming Manual describes enough of the architecture to implement.

from boomerang.

The problem is not with the description of the AMD64, but with the cpu specification framework boomerang uses. It's a pretty obscure machine code parser generator using New Jersey Machine Code Toolkit.
I've pondered generating boomerang SSL compatible asm statements using Capstone but it's waaaay down the priority list

from boomerang.