priority with template type about high-speed-priority-queue-for-c-sharp HOT 6 CLOSED

Hmm. This is a good idea, but I'm not sure how it could be implemented without completely rewriting SimplePriorityQueue. I don't want to add it to FastPriorityQueue too because of the performance hit. I'll have to think about it.

from high-speed-priority-queue-for-c-sharp.

I have just done those required by @goldenbull at https://github.com/zijianhuang/High-Speed-Priority-Queue-for-C-Sharp

now Priority could be generic, while backward compatibility with current HEAD in origin is kept.

When more stress tests are done, I will create a pull request.

Meanwhile, you @goldenbull may just use my fork in which currently the default Priority type is double. And I don't think you need to use DateTime for priority, since you could use DateTime.ToOATime().

from high-speed-priority-queue-for-c-sharp.

@zijianhuang there is no ToOATime method in C# DateTime struct, I guess you meant to say ToOADate :)
There is still data loss because I have some high frequence data which needs the precision to 1us

from high-speed-priority-queue-for-c-sharp.

@BlueRaja yes, this will make a big change from the base of the whole building, I'm not sure if it's neccessary.
Nevertheless, for my special case, I can modify several lines and change the float type to long in hard-code way. Glories to BlueRaja :)

from high-speed-priority-queue-for-c-sharp.

Completed in version 4.0. The new declaration for SimplePriorityQueue is SimplePriorityQueue<TItem, TPriority>

Generics won't be added to FastPriorityQueue - I found they cause a ~5% slowdown. If someone really needs a generic version and SimplePriorityQueue is too slow, there is an undocumented class named GenericPriorityQueue<TItem, TPriority> which they can use.

from high-speed-priority-queue-for-c-sharp.

👍

from high-speed-priority-queue-for-c-sharp.