Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (4)

PaulWagener avatar PaulWagener commented on August 17, 2024

Just found out that the minimal example doesn't even involve generics. The following example also produces a duplicate method in the generated code:

class Base {
    func method(withArg: UInt) {
    }
}


class Derived: Base {
    override func method(withArg: UInt) {
    }
}

from mockingbird.

andrewchang-bird avatar andrewchang-bird commented on August 17, 2024

Thanks for reporting, Paul! This regression in 0.12 should be fixed by #119. The original plan in the #118 issue was to wait until the upcoming release, but since this extends to declarations in class mocks we’ll push out a patch on Monday.

from mockingbird.

PaulWagener avatar PaulWagener commented on August 17, 2024

Thanks for the quick fix. I can confirm that the duplicate override method has been fixed when using the latest code in master.

However another issue has still remained with regards to overriding methods with generics.
Take for example this example code:

class Concrete {
}

class Base<T> {
    func method(vertices: [T]) {
    }
}

class Derived: Base<Concrete> {
}

It results in the following generated code:

public final class DerivedMock: Mocky.Derived, Mockingbird.Mock {

  ...

  // MARK: Mocked `method`(`vertices`: [T])

  public override func `method`(`vertices`: [T]) -> Void {
    let invocation: Mockingbird.Invocation = Mockingbird.Invocation(selectorName: "`method`(`vertices`: [T]) -> Void", arguments: [Mockingbird.ArgumentMatcher(`vertices`)], returnType: Swift.ObjectIdentifier((Void).self))
    mockingContext.didInvoke(invocation) { () -> Void in
      let implementation = stubbingContext.implementation(for: invocation)
      if let concreteImplementation = implementation as? ([T]) -> Void {
        concreteImplementation(`vertices`)
      } else if let concreteImplementation = implementation as? () -> Void {
        concreteImplementation()
      }
    }
  }
  ...
}

This results in the error Use of undeclared type 'T'. The expected generated code would use the Concrete type here.

Interestingly it does generate the correct code when the type parameter isn't an array

I've tested this on a246a83 (master)

from mockingbird.

andrewchang-bird avatar andrewchang-bird commented on August 17, 2024

Thanks for the update!

The latest issue is caused by the type specializer not working recursively on type declarations. There isn’t a great workaround for this right now, but I’ll look into it for 0.13.

from mockingbird.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.