Error in BoM about rumba32 HOT 7 CLOSED

Hi @leseaw,

Yes, you're right, there's an issue with this line in the BOM. We noticed this recently but it hasn't been corrected yet. I don't believe we were able to find a part matching the specifications we gave in an 0603 package - in our current batch of boards we have used the following part:

C1608X7S1A475K080AC - CAP CER 4.7UF 10V X7S 0603 (Digikey 445-14258-1-ND)

That matches the capacitance, voltage, and package, but is dropping from an X7R to X7S. This is just a small tolerance change and won't be a problem in this application, as the capacitance value is not critical.

We will likely be updating the BOM to this or a similar part soon.

from rumba32.

Hi @chrissbarr ,

Are there any more changes which are still wrong in the BoM?

from rumba32.

Not that I am aware of. Apart from that one exception, we are using the BOM as included without any changes.

from rumba32.

okay thanks @chrissbarr
And read your E-Mails :)

from rumba32.

No worries @leseaw - just to be sure, you did get my reply last week?

from rumba32.

@chrissbarr yes :) this i s why i write here. i answer you.

from rumba32.

@chrissbarr my mails to you come back :( time out from your mailserver.

from rumba32.