Support for generating string discriminated unions about prisma-json-types-generator HOT 4 CLOSED

Hi @noahsark769, awesome idea! I'd love to implement it!

from prisma-json-types-generator.

You'd probably start by changing some Ifs that filters out non Json field types, and then adding your case to this function.

But, I think a new syntax for string literals or even some checks should be made to prevent you assign a non string literal type to a string, which will only throw an error at runtime.

As you can see, the replace signature handle all variations a field can have, Like User, Prisma.UserFindManyArgs and so on. If you get some complex fields, like StringFilter, using a more generic approach should do the job. (Like the Update<T> generated type and its usage)

I'm currently moving to another state, but i'll try to merge it asap. :)

from prisma-json-types-generator.

Alright, started on a draft PR at #39, managed to get local development set up and tests passing for the simple string case, will work on implementing support for more complex filter types and unions soon!

from prisma-json-types-generator.

Merged #39

from prisma-json-types-generator.